Inglês — CACD 2011

CESPE/UnB · CACD – 1ª fase (TPS) · 53 itens · julgue cada item como Certo ou Errado

Quer responder e ver o gabarito comentado?

Na Lumen você marca Certo ou Errado, vê o gabarito e o comentário de cada item, acompanha seu desempenho por matéria e estuda pelo edital verticalizado.

Cadastre-se
1 It may not stir up international outrage like its semi-namesake WikiLeaks, but Wikipedia sparks debate. The freeonline encyclopedia, which celebrates its tenth birthday on4January 15th, is a symbol of unpaid collaboration and one of themost popular destinations on the Internet, attracting some400m visitors a month. It also faces serious charges of elitism.7 Wikipedia offers more than 17m articles in 247languages. Every day thousands of people edit entries or addnew ones in return for nothing more than the satisfaction of10contributing to the stock of human knowledge. Wikipediarelies on its users’ generosity to fill its coffers as well as itspages. Recent visitors to the website were confronted with13images of Jimmy Wales, a co-founder, and a request fordonations. The campaign was annoying but effective, raising$ 16m in 50 days.16 With its emphasis on bottom-up collaboration and thebroad dissemination of knowledge, the online encyclopedia isin many ways an incarnation of the fundamental values of the19web. But Wikipedia also reveals some of the pitfalls of theincreasingly popular “crowdsourcing” model of contentcreation. One is maintaining accuracy. On the whole,22Wikipedia’s system of peer reviewing does a reasonable job ofpolicing facts. But it is vulnerable to vandalism. Severalpoliticians and TV personalities have had their deaths25announced in Wikipedia while they were still in fine fettle. Some observers argue the site should start payingexpert editors to produce and oversee content, and sell28advertising to cover the cost. Problems with accuracy “are aninevitable consequence of a free-labour approach”, argues AlexJannykhin, of WikiExperts, which advises organisations on31how to create Wikipedia articles (the very existence of suchoutfits hints at Wikipedia’s importance, as well as itssusceptibility to outside influence). The encyclopedia’s bosses34retort that such concerns are overblown and that takingadvertisers would dent its appeal to users.

Wikipedia. The promise and perils of crowdsourcing content. In: The Economist, January 15th-21st, 2011, p. 69 (adapted).

According to the text, judge if the following items are right (C) or wrong (E).

  1. 1.

    From the last paragraph, it is correct to infer that volunteer work is inherently slovenly and deceptive.

  2. 2.

    The terms “stir up” (l.1) and “sparks” (l.2) bear a semantic relationship to the verb to fuel.

  3. 3.

    On line 23, “But it is vulnerable to vandalism” can be correctly replaced by Furthermore, it falls prey to vandalism, without change in meaning.

  4. 4.

    On line 25, “while they were still in fine fettle” can be correctly rewritten as even before their bodies could be prepared for burial, without change in meaning.

1 Nobel was an ardent advocate of arbitration, thoughnot of disarmament, which he thought a foolish demand for thepresent. He urged establishment of a tribunal and agreement4among nations for a one-year period of compulsory truce inany dispute. He turned up in person, though incognito, at aPeace Congress in Bern in 1892 and told Bertha von Suttner7that if she could “inform me, convince me, I will do somethinggreat for the cause”. The spark of friendship between them hadbeen kept alive in correspondence and an occasional visit over10the years and he now wrote her that a new era of violenceseemed to be working itself up: “one hears in the distance itshollow rumble already.” Two months later he wrote again,13“I should like to dispose of my fortune to found a prize to beawarded every five years” to the person who had contributedmost effectively to the peace of Europe. He thought that it16should terminate after six awards, “for if in thirty years societycannot be reformed we shall inevitably lapse into barbarism”.Nobel brooded over the plan, embodied it in a will drawn in191895 which allowed man a little longer deadline, and died thefollowing year.

Barbara Tuchman. The proud power. MacMillan Company, 1966, p. 233 (adapted).

Judge the following item, concerning the verbs in the text.

  1. 5.

    The forms “brooded” (l.18), “embodied” (l.18) and “died” (l.19) can be replaced, respectively, by has brooded, has embodied and has died without effecting a significant change in the original meaning of the text.

  2. 6.

    In ‘I will do something great’ (l.7-8), the use of ‘will’ conveys the idea of imposition.

  3. 7.

    The verbal form ‘should’ (l.13) could be replaced by would without effecting a significant change in the meaning of the text.

  4. 8.

    In “The spark of friendship between them had been kept alive” (l.8-9), the use of the form “had been” implies the connection between von Suttner and Nobel took place after the Peace Congress.

  5. 9.

    The use of the form ‘to be awarded’ (l.13-14) directs the focus of the sentence to those who award the prize.

1 Nobel was an ardent advocate of arbitration, thoughnot of disarmament, which he thought a foolish demand for thepresent. He urged establishment of a tribunal and agreement4among nations for a one-year period of compulsory truce inany dispute. He turned up in person, though incognito, at aPeace Congress in Bern in 1892 and told Bertha von Suttner7that if she could “inform me, convince me, I will do somethinggreat for the cause”. The spark of friendship between them hadbeen kept alive in correspondence and an occasional visit over10the years and he now wrote her that a new era of violenceseemed to be working itself up: “one hears in the distance itshollow rumble already.” Two months later he wrote again,13“I should like to dispose of my fortune to found a prize to beawarded every five years” to the person who had contributedmost effectively to the peace of Europe. He thought that it16should terminate after six awards, “for if in thirty years societycannot be reformed we shall inevitably lapse into barbarism”.Nobel brooded over the plan, embodied it in a will drawn in191895 which allowed man a little longer deadline, and died thefollowing year.

Barbara Tuchman. The proud power. MacMillan Company, 1966, p. 233 (adapted).

In the text,

  1. 10.

    the word ‘for’ (l.16) can be replaced by since with no change in the original meaning of the sentence.

  2. 11.

    “brooded over” and “will”, both on line 18, mean respectively pondered and an official statement disposing of a person’s property after his or her death.

  3. 12.

    the pronoun “it” (l.15) refers to Nobel’s fortune.

  4. 13.

    the term “spark” (l.8) is used in its connotative meaning.

1 It may not stir up international outrage like its semi-namesake WikiLeaks, but Wikipedia sparks debate. The freeonline encyclopedia, which celebrates its tenth birthday on4January 15th, is a symbol of unpaid collaboration and one of themost popular destinations on the Internet, attracting some400m visitors a month. It also faces serious charges of elitism.7 Wikipedia offers more than 17m articles in 247languages. Every day thousands of people edit entries or addnew ones in return for nothing more than the satisfaction of10contributing to the stock of human knowledge. Wikipediarelies on its users’ generosity to fill its coffers as well as itspages. Recent visitors to the website were confronted with13images of Jimmy Wales, a co-founder, and a request fordonations. The campaign was annoying but effective, raising$ 16m in 50 days.16 With its emphasis on bottom-up collaboration and thebroad dissemination of knowledge, the online encyclopedia isin many ways an incarnation of the fundamental values of the19web. But Wikipedia also reveals some of the pitfalls of theincreasingly popular “crowdsourcing” model of contentcreation. One is maintaining accuracy. On the whole,22Wikipedia’s system of peer reviewing does a reasonable job ofpolicing facts. But it is vulnerable to vandalism. Severalpoliticians and TV personalities have had their deaths25announced in Wikipedia while they were still in fine fettle. Some observers argue the site should start payingexpert editors to produce and oversee content, and sell28advertising to cover the cost. Problems with accuracy “are aninevitable consequence of a free-labour approach”, argues AlexJannykhin, of WikiExperts, which advises organisations on31how to create Wikipedia articles (the very existence of suchoutfits hints at Wikipedia’s importance, as well as itssusceptibility to outside influence). The encyclopedia’s bosses34retort that such concerns are overblown and that takingadvertisers would dent its appeal to users.

Wikipedia. The promise and perils of crowdsourcing content. In: The Economist, January 15th-21st, 2011, p. 69 (adapted).

Based on the text, judge if the items below are right (C) or wrong (E).

  1. 14.

    One of the major concerns regarding the content of the online encyclopedia is its vulnerability to inclusion of imprecise information.

  2. 15.

    The basic concepts behind Wikipedia are inconsistent with the usefulness of unhindered access to the Internet.

  3. 16.

    Not all articles in Wikipedia must be submitted by personal individual collaborators.

  4. 17.

    It is possible to deduce from the text that Wikipedia resorted to an appeal for public monetary contributions.

1 It may not stir up international outrage like its semi-namesake WikiLeaks, but Wikipedia sparks debate. The freeonline encyclopedia, which celebrates its tenth birthday on4January 15th, is a symbol of unpaid collaboration and one of themost popular destinations on the Internet, attracting some400m visitors a month. It also faces serious charges of elitism.7 Wikipedia offers more than 17m articles in 247languages. Every day thousands of people edit entries or addnew ones in return for nothing more than the satisfaction of10contributing to the stock of human knowledge. Wikipediarelies on its users’ generosity to fill its coffers as well as itspages. Recent visitors to the website were confronted with13images of Jimmy Wales, a co-founder, and a request fordonations. The campaign was annoying but effective, raising$ 16m in 50 days.16 With its emphasis on bottom-up collaboration and thebroad dissemination of knowledge, the online encyclopedia isin many ways an incarnation of the fundamental values of the19web. But Wikipedia also reveals some of the pitfalls of theincreasingly popular “crowdsourcing” model of contentcreation. One is maintaining accuracy. On the whole,22Wikipedia’s system of peer reviewing does a reasonable job ofpolicing facts. But it is vulnerable to vandalism. Severalpoliticians and TV personalities have had their deaths25announced in Wikipedia while they were still in fine fettle. Some observers argue the site should start payingexpert editors to produce and oversee content, and sell28advertising to cover the cost. Problems with accuracy “are aninevitable consequence of a free-labour approach”, argues AlexJannykhin, of WikiExperts, which advises organisations on31how to create Wikipedia articles (the very existence of suchoutfits hints at Wikipedia’s importance, as well as itssusceptibility to outside influence). The encyclopedia’s bosses34retort that such concerns are overblown and that takingadvertisers would dent its appeal to users.

Wikipedia. The promise and perils of crowdsourcing content. In: The Economist, January 15th-21st, 2011, p. 69 (adapted).

Judge the following item, according to the text.

  1. 18.

    Contributions to Wikipedia come both in the form of spontaneous inclusion and reviewing of texts as well as of gifts of money.

  2. 19.

    Underlying the idea of Wikipedia is the premise of a profitable approach to the compilation and diffusion of human values and customs.

  3. 20.

    The bulk of Wikipedia articles deliberately misguide its users as to the actual death of some celebrities.

  4. 21.

    Advertising would increase the reliability and acceptance of Wikipedia, according to its owners.

  5. 22.

    Wikipedia is not free of charge, for it launches aggressive worldwide fund-raising campaigns.

1 Nobel was an ardent advocate of arbitration, thoughnot of disarmament, which he thought a foolish demand for thepresent. He urged establishment of a tribunal and agreement4among nations for a one-year period of compulsory truce inany dispute. He turned up in person, though incognito, at aPeace Congress in Bern in 1892 and told Bertha von Suttner7that if she could “inform me, convince me, I will do somethinggreat for the cause”. The spark of friendship between them hadbeen kept alive in correspondence and an occasional visit over10the years and he now wrote her that a new era of violenceseemed to be working itself up: “one hears in the distance itshollow rumble already.” Two months later he wrote again,13“I should like to dispose of my fortune to found a prize to beawarded every five years” to the person who had contributedmost effectively to the peace of Europe. He thought that it16should terminate after six awards, “for if in thirty years societycannot be reformed we shall inevitably lapse into barbarism”.Nobel brooded over the plan, embodied it in a will drawn in191895 which allowed man a little longer deadline, and died thefollowing year.

Barbara Tuchman. The proud power. MacMillan Company, 1966, p. 233 (adapted).

Based on the text, judge if the following items are right (C) or wrong (E).

  1. 23.

    The author puts forward a tentative suggestion that Nobel’s continued commitment to the cause of arbitration rendered him impervious to the idea of disarmament.

  2. 24.

    Nobel predicted that peace would only last thirty years, because violence in Europe was increasing.

  3. 25.

    Nobel suggested that ominous signs of impending violence could be discerned in the offing.

  4. 26.

    It can be inferred from the text that Nobel did a dramatic volte-face concerning his stance on peace or disarmament.

1 Remembrance of things past is often dearest to thosewho are bored or driven to despair by the world around them.To these the contemplation of times gone by brings surcease4from current burdens too heavy to bear. “Take not away fromme” implored the Emperor Julian, world-weary monarch inanother age of disenchantment, “this mad love for that which7no longer is. That which has been is more splendidly beautifulthan all that is…” To others, concerned as watchers andmovers with the challenge of today and the promise or menace10of tomorrow, the tale of many yesterdays, reconstructed by thehistory and the science of living men and women, has anothermeaning.13 By revealing what has gone before, it illumines theact of the human adventure now being played and suggests thepattern of acts to come. The drama of earthborn and16earthbound humanity, despite all its crises and intermissions,is a continuous story. All the characters are prisoners of time.All the problems of the now are forever shaped by the19experiences of a then which extends back in unbrokensequence to the origins of life. Each generation has freedom tochoose among alternative designs for destiny, and opportunity22to win some measure of mastery over its fate, only to the extentof its comprehension of where it stands in the cavalcade ofyears, decades, centuries, and millennia ticked off by the25spinning planet.

Frederick L. Schuman. International politics: the destiny of the Western state system. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1948, p. 1 (adapted).

Still in the fields of semantics and grammar of the text, judge if the items below are right (C) or wrong (E).

  1. 27.

    If “ticked off” (l.24) and “spinning” (l.25) were replaced respectively by marked off and rotating, there would occur no grammar mistakes in the sentence.

  2. 28.

    The words “crises” (l.16) and “millennia” (l.24), as well as theses and fulcra, can only be found in their plural forms.

  3. 29.

    In the fragment “All the problems of the now are forever shaped by the experiences of a then” (l.18-19), the words “now” and “then” can be replaced respectively by here and there without effecting changes in the meaning and the grammatical correction of the passage.

  4. 30.

    In the first paragraph, the words “world-weary” (l.5) and “disenchantment” (l.6) establish a semantic relation which reveals the pessimism which was felt by the “monarch” (l.5) and characterized his “age” (l.6).

1 Remembrance of things past is often dearest to thosewho are bored or driven to despair by the world around them.To these the contemplation of times gone by brings surcease4from current burdens too heavy to bear. “Take not away fromme” implored the Emperor Julian, world-weary monarch inanother age of disenchantment, “this mad love for that which7no longer is. That which has been is more splendidly beautifulthan all that is…” To others, concerned as watchers andmovers with the challenge of today and the promise or menace10of tomorrow, the tale of many yesterdays, reconstructed by thehistory and the science of living men and women, has anothermeaning.13 By revealing what has gone before, it illumines theact of the human adventure now being played and suggests thepattern of acts to come. The drama of earthborn and16earthbound humanity, despite all its crises and intermissions,is a continuous story. All the characters are prisoners of time.All the problems of the now are forever shaped by the19experiences of a then which extends back in unbrokensequence to the origins of life. Each generation has freedom tochoose among alternative designs for destiny, and opportunity22to win some measure of mastery over its fate, only to the extentof its comprehension of where it stands in the cavalcade ofyears, decades, centuries, and millennia ticked off by the25spinning planet.

Frederick L. Schuman. International politics: the destiny of the Western state system. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1948, p. 1 (adapted).

As far as the semantic and grammar features of the text are concerned, judge if the following items are right (C) or wrong (E).

  1. 31.

    The pronoun “it” (l13) refers to “another meaning” (l.11-12).

  2. 32.

    The word “and” (l.15) is used as a stylistic device to bring together two synonymous words, “earthborn” (l.15) and “earthbound” (l.16).

  3. 33.

    A more up-to-date manner to convey the notion expressed by “illumines” (l.13) is sheds light on.

  4. 34.

    The expression “watchers and movers” (l.8-9) refers to people who play clearly distinct roles as far as political action is concerned.

1 Remembrance of things past is often dearest to thosewho are bored or driven to despair by the world around them.To these the contemplation of times gone by brings surcease4from current burdens too heavy to bear. “Take not away fromme” implored the Emperor Julian, world-weary monarch inanother age of disenchantment, “this mad love for that which7no longer is. That which has been is more splendidly beautifulthan all that is…” To others, concerned as watchers andmovers with the challenge of today and the promise or menace10of tomorrow, the tale of many yesterdays, reconstructed by thehistory and the science of living men and women, has anothermeaning.13 By revealing what has gone before, it illumines theact of the human adventure now being played and suggests thepattern of acts to come. The drama of earthborn and16earthbound humanity, despite all its crises and intermissions,is a continuous story. All the characters are prisoners of time.All the problems of the now are forever shaped by the19experiences of a then which extends back in unbrokensequence to the origins of life. Each generation has freedom tochoose among alternative designs for destiny, and opportunity22to win some measure of mastery over its fate, only to the extentof its comprehension of where it stands in the cavalcade ofyears, decades, centuries, and millennia ticked off by the25spinning planet.

Frederick L. Schuman. International politics: the destiny of the Western state system. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1948, p. 1 (adapted).

Judge the following item, concerning the particle “as” (l.8).

  1. 35.

    The particle “as” (l.8) is used in the text to express the idea of because.

  2. 36.

    The particle “as” (l.8) is used in the text in a comparison to refer to the degree of something.

  3. 37.

    The particle “as” (l.8) is used in the text to describe the purpose or quality of someone or something.

  4. 38.

    The particle “as” (l.8) is used in the text to express the idea of in the same way.

  5. 39.

    The particle “as” (l.8) is used in the text to express the idea of while.

1 It may not stir up international outrage like its semi-namesake WikiLeaks, but Wikipedia sparks debate. The freeonline encyclopedia, which celebrates its tenth birthday on4January 15th, is a symbol of unpaid collaboration and one of themost popular destinations on the Internet, attracting some400m visitors a month. It also faces serious charges of elitism.7 Wikipedia offers more than 17m articles in 247languages. Every day thousands of people edit entries or addnew ones in return for nothing more than the satisfaction of10contributing to the stock of human knowledge. Wikipediarelies on its users’ generosity to fill its coffers as well as itspages. Recent visitors to the website were confronted with13images of Jimmy Wales, a co-founder, and a request fordonations. The campaign was annoying but effective, raising$ 16m in 50 days.16 With its emphasis on bottom-up collaboration and thebroad dissemination of knowledge, the online encyclopedia isin many ways an incarnation of the fundamental values of the19web. But Wikipedia also reveals some of the pitfalls of theincreasingly popular “crowdsourcing” model of contentcreation. One is maintaining accuracy. On the whole,22Wikipedia’s system of peer reviewing does a reasonable job ofpolicing facts. But it is vulnerable to vandalism. Severalpoliticians and TV personalities have had their deaths25announced in Wikipedia while they were still in fine fettle. Some observers argue the site should start payingexpert editors to produce and oversee content, and sell28advertising to cover the cost. Problems with accuracy “are aninevitable consequence of a free-labour approach”, argues AlexJannykhin, of WikiExperts, which advises organisations on31how to create Wikipedia articles (the very existence of suchoutfits hints at Wikipedia’s importance, as well as itssusceptibility to outside influence). The encyclopedia’s bosses34retort that such concerns are overblown and that takingadvertisers would dent its appeal to users.

Wikipedia. The promise and perils of crowdsourcing content. In: The Economist, January 15th-21st, 2011, p. 69 (adapted).

Judge the following item, concerning the expression “peer reviewing” (l.22).

  1. 40.

    In the text, the expression “peer reviewing” (l.22) refers to the system used by Wikipedia to minimize the publication of false information.

  2. 41.

    In the text, the expression “peer reviewing” (l.22) refers to a thorough check of facts and figures carried out by individuals who have spotless academic reputations.

  3. 42.

    In the text, the expression “peer reviewing” (l.22) refers to a friendly way of going over factual research.

  4. 43.

    In the text, the expression “peer reviewing” (l.22) refers to the mounting pressure brought to bear on an individual by his or her colleagues.

  5. 44.

    In the text, the expression “peer reviewing” (l.22) refers to an enforcement of rules similar to that performed by police officers.

1 It may not stir up international outrage like its semi-namesake WikiLeaks, but Wikipedia sparks debate. The freeonline encyclopedia, which celebrates its tenth birthday on4January 15th, is a symbol of unpaid collaboration and one of themost popular destinations on the Internet, attracting some400m visitors a month. It also faces serious charges of elitism.7 Wikipedia offers more than 17m articles in 247languages. Every day thousands of people edit entries or addnew ones in return for nothing more than the satisfaction of10contributing to the stock of human knowledge. Wikipediarelies on its users’ generosity to fill its coffers as well as itspages. Recent visitors to the website were confronted with13images of Jimmy Wales, a co-founder, and a request fordonations. The campaign was annoying but effective, raising$ 16m in 50 days.16 With its emphasis on bottom-up collaboration and thebroad dissemination of knowledge, the online encyclopedia isin many ways an incarnation of the fundamental values of the19web. But Wikipedia also reveals some of the pitfalls of theincreasingly popular “crowdsourcing” model of contentcreation. One is maintaining accuracy. On the whole,22Wikipedia’s system of peer reviewing does a reasonable job ofpolicing facts. But it is vulnerable to vandalism. Severalpoliticians and TV personalities have had their deaths25announced in Wikipedia while they were still in fine fettle. Some observers argue the site should start payingexpert editors to produce and oversee content, and sell28advertising to cover the cost. Problems with accuracy “are aninevitable consequence of a free-labour approach”, argues AlexJannykhin, of WikiExperts, which advises organisations on31how to create Wikipedia articles (the very existence of suchoutfits hints at Wikipedia’s importance, as well as itssusceptibility to outside influence). The encyclopedia’s bosses34retort that such concerns are overblown and that takingadvertisers would dent its appeal to users.

Wikipedia. The promise and perils of crowdsourcing content. In: The Economist, January 15th-21st, 2011, p. 69 (adapted).

Judge the following item, concerning the word “overblown” (l.34).

  1. 45.

    In the text, the word “overblown” (l.34) is synonymous with widespread.

  2. 46.

    In the text, the word “overblown” (l.34) is synonymous with grave.

  3. 47.

    In the text, the word “overblown” (l.34) is synonymous with excessive.

  4. 48.

    In the text, the word “overblown” (l.34) is synonymous with fundamental.

  5. 49.

    In the text, the word “overblown” (l.34) is synonymous with mounting.

1 Remembrance of things past is often dearest to thosewho are bored or driven to despair by the world around them.To these the contemplation of times gone by brings surcease4from current burdens too heavy to bear. “Take not away fromme” implored the Emperor Julian, world-weary monarch inanother age of disenchantment, “this mad love for that which7no longer is. That which has been is more splendidly beautifulthan all that is…” To others, concerned as watchers andmovers with the challenge of today and the promise or menace10of tomorrow, the tale of many yesterdays, reconstructed by thehistory and the science of living men and women, has anothermeaning.13 By revealing what has gone before, it illumines theact of the human adventure now being played and suggests thepattern of acts to come. The drama of earthborn and16earthbound humanity, despite all its crises and intermissions,is a continuous story. All the characters are prisoners of time.All the problems of the now are forever shaped by the19experiences of a then which extends back in unbrokensequence to the origins of life. Each generation has freedom tochoose among alternative designs for destiny, and opportunity22to win some measure of mastery over its fate, only to the extentof its comprehension of where it stands in the cavalcade ofyears, decades, centuries, and millennia ticked off by the25spinning planet.

Frederick L. Schuman. International politics: the destiny of the Western state system. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1948, p. 1 (adapted).

Based on the text, judge if the items below are right (C) or wrong (E).

  1. 50.

    One can infer from the text that backward or nostalgic views of the world have existed for more than a thousand years.

  2. 51.

    The author’s clear intention in the first paragraph is to rightly extol the virtues of extreme political reactionarism.

  3. 52.

    The author of the text suggests that nostalgia is the preserve of desperate people.

  4. 53.

    According to the text, although past events should be taken into consideration, humankind can choose its future and destiny freely.

Quer responder e ver o gabarito comentado?

Na Lumen você marca Certo ou Errado, vê o gabarito e o comentário de cada item, acompanha seu desempenho por matéria e estuda pelo edital verticalizado.

Cadastre-se

Outras matérias do CACD 2011